![]() Skype: blake.a.hansen | 2900 K Street, Suite 404, Washington D.C. at the beginning of any conversation or message thread, after a significant lapse of time, or when a chat moves from human interaction to automated. On, at 18:48, Lars Helge Øverland wrote: Skype: Please let us know if these are orphans are coming back, and if you have a feel for which system operation they come from. The delete worked without complaint and it seems these are orphans. Skype: blake.a.hansen | 2900 K Street, Suite 404, Washington D.C. Is that correct? Should I delete these manually via SQL? Now, these rows seems to be orphans, because they have no children in the following tables: datadimensionitem, datasetoperands, sectiongreyedfields. So, I have several rows in dataelementoperand table preventing me from deleting several catoptioncombos. I went through the api and attempted a delete of the Cat Option Combos for the Cat Combo and was returned an error saying the deletion couldn’t proceed because of an association with the dataelementoperand table. If you get complaints, please let us know from which constraints/tables. If not they are orphans - we need to look for places where these are not cleaned up. Could you please try to delete these dataelementoperands with SQL and see if you get any complaints from PostgreSQL constraints? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |